Montréal · Public protest September 26 · Read the recap

Your starting point

Where do you stand today?

AI poses a genuine existential risk.
01

AI poses a genuine existential risk.

A pause or treaty could materially reduce that risk.
02

A pause or treaty could materially reduce that risk.

International coordination is politically achievable—countries can agree, comply, and enforce it.
03

International coordination is politically achievable—countries can agree, comply, and enforce it.

Start where you have questions.

Understand the risk

Why do researchers discuss existential risk?

How could people lose control of an AI system? Read an introduction to the risks researchers are studying.

Read the source overview

Source: PauseAI

Bookmark
?

Register to save this reading to your account and access it on other devices.

Register

Evaluate responses

What would a pause actually mean?

What would pause, what would continue, and how a pause differs from a blanket ban on AI.

Examine the proposal

Source: PauseAI

Bookmark
?

Register to save this reading to your account and access it on other devices.

Register

Test coordination

Could a global treaty be verified?

How inspections of advanced chips and data centres could help countries verify an agreement.

Explore the mechanisms

Source: PauseAI (in English)

Bookmark
?

Register to save this reading to your account and access it on other devices.

Register

Move toward action

Why public support matters

Letters, meetings and public events can show elected representatives that people want action on AI risks.

Read the summary

Source: PauseAI Canada

Bookmark
?

Register to save this reading to your account and access it on other devices.

Register

Get updates or take action

Get updates Take action